Post by ivykhan885 on Mar 5, 2024 5:06:47 GMT -5
Previously, a woman was allowed to use her maiden name alone in very exceptional cases and if there were justified reasons. However, recently, this change of a woman's surname has been interpreted as contrary to equality by the Constitutional Court and is subject to sanctions by the European Court of Human Rights. Which lawsuit should a woman file in order to be able to use her maiden name alone? In order for a woman to use her maiden name, she must first file a lawsuit against the civil registry office or her husband in the family court and get married. In accordance with Article 187 fI, it is necessary to request the correction of the civil registry and the removal of the surname belonging to the husband, claiming that taking the husband's surname is against Human Rights. If the court rejects the request, the Appeal and the Supreme Court reviews are carried out, and if these authorities approve the decision of the first instance court, an individual application is made to the Constitutional Court and a decision is requested that the individual application is justified regarding the court decision that is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights.
In its decision dated 19.12.2013 and numbered 2013/2187, the Australia Telegram Number Data Constitutional Court decided that women should be able to use their maiden name in order to ensure equality. Previously, a woman was allowed to use her maiden name alone in very exceptional cases and if there were justified reasons. However, recently, this change of a woman's surname has been interpreted as contrary to equality by the Constitutional Court and is subject to sanctions by the European Court of Human Rights. Which lawsuit should a woman file in order to be able to use her maiden name alone? In order for a woman to use her maiden name, she must first file a lawsuit against the civil registry office or her husband in the family court and get married.
In accordance with Article 187 fI, it is necessary to request the correction of the civil registry and the removal of the surname belonging to the husband, claiming that taking the husband's surname is against Human Rights. If the court rejects the request, the Appeal and the Supreme Court reviews are carried out, and if these authorities approve the decision of the first instance court, an individual application is made to the Constitutional Court and a decision is requested that the individual application is justified regarding the court decision that is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. In its decision dated 19.12.2013 and numbered 2013/2187, the Constitutional Court decided that women should be able to use their maiden name in order to ensure equality.
In its decision dated 19.12.2013 and numbered 2013/2187, the Australia Telegram Number Data Constitutional Court decided that women should be able to use their maiden name in order to ensure equality. Previously, a woman was allowed to use her maiden name alone in very exceptional cases and if there were justified reasons. However, recently, this change of a woman's surname has been interpreted as contrary to equality by the Constitutional Court and is subject to sanctions by the European Court of Human Rights. Which lawsuit should a woman file in order to be able to use her maiden name alone? In order for a woman to use her maiden name, she must first file a lawsuit against the civil registry office or her husband in the family court and get married.
In accordance with Article 187 fI, it is necessary to request the correction of the civil registry and the removal of the surname belonging to the husband, claiming that taking the husband's surname is against Human Rights. If the court rejects the request, the Appeal and the Supreme Court reviews are carried out, and if these authorities approve the decision of the first instance court, an individual application is made to the Constitutional Court and a decision is requested that the individual application is justified regarding the court decision that is contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. In its decision dated 19.12.2013 and numbered 2013/2187, the Constitutional Court decided that women should be able to use their maiden name in order to ensure equality.